What it takes to make confident investment decisions
At a glance
Andrew is an Executive Advisor within GHD's Business Advisory practice. He has 17 years of experience helping government agencies and infrastructure owners make complex investment decisions. He has led and supported business cases and strategic advisory projects for nationally significant transport, resilience and growth programmes across New Zealand.
Every year, agencies make infrastructure decisions worth billions of dollars with imperfect information, competing priorities and uncertain futures.
Having spent more than 17 years helping clients navigate complex investment decisions, I have learned that the best decisions are rarely those supported by the greatest volume of analysis. They are the ones supported by the right evidence, the right conversations and a clear understanding of problems and their root causes, as well as the decisions and trade-offs being made.
Investment decisions are becoming more difficult
Infrastructure planning is becoming increasingly complex. Today, decision-makers face changing demographics, growth pressures, climate risks, rising costs and tighter funding. Communities also expect investments to support broader outcomes, including safety, accessibility, housing growth, environmental sustainability and wellbeing.
For infrastructure providers, the challenge is determining which investments should proceed first, which should wait and how limited resources can achieve the greatest overall outcome.
Start with the decision, not the solution
Across transport, resilience and growth programmes worth billions of dollars, one principle has shaped my approach: the goal is not to justify a preferred solution. It is to give decision-makers the confidence to commit to the decision.
Some projects begin with the intervention already in mind, such as a new road, intersection upgrade, resilience improvement or public transport investment. Strong business cases take a step back and ask a different question: What problems are we trying to solve?
The challenge for NZTA's South Island State Highway Resilience Programme was balancing resilience, affordability and competing priorities across the state highway network. For the Resilience Panel business cases, there were too many sites vulnerable to natural hazards to address them all at once.
Our approach focused on the key investment decisions first. Collaborating with technical specialists, regional stakeholders, partners and NZTA teams, we helped identify where limited funding could reduce the greatest network risk.
The outcome was a staged programme of investments designed to improve resilience for communities, businesses and visitors, while maximising risk reduction within available funding.
Turn complexity into clarity
Infrastructure projects generate enormous volumes of technical information. Decision-makers need a clear line of sight between the evidence, the problem being addressed, the recommended investment pathway and any residual risks.
Much of my role is to translate technical analysis into advice that clients can use at critical points in a project. That means testing assumptions, comparing options and making trade-offs visible.
Plan for uncertainty rather than avoid it
Infrastructure planning cannot eliminate uncertainty. Growth, travel demand, technology adoption and climate risks will continue to shift. Strong investment decisions acknowledge this and test how options perform under different future conditions.
On projects such as Tauranga’s Cameron Road Detailed Business Case and various business cases for NZTA, we focused on adaptable investment pathways rather than locking decisions to a single forecast. This mindset creates stronger investment decisions because it allows organisations to respond as circumstances change.
Collaborate to create better outcomes
Complex projects inevitably involve competing priorities and differing perspectives. A good business case does not eliminate those differences. It gives decision-makers a transparent view of the evidence, trade-offs and consequences of different choices.
The best solutions emerge when technical specialists, decision-makers, stakeholders, communities and delivery partners work together early. Collaboration improves the quality of recommendations and helps clients act with clarity.
Andrew was excellent at escalating the right issues to the project sponsor and leadership team. The team were invaluable and I'd like to take the opportunity to say how grateful we are for them being with us through the journey.”
Throughout my career, I have learned that successful infrastructure investment is not about predicting the future with perfect accuracy. It is about giving decision-makers enough confidence to invest. In an increasingly uncertain world, that confidence is one of the most valuable outcomes a compelling business case can deliver.